Labour Party Questions "Tinubu Presidential Legal Team" Imprint On Tribunal Judgement, Raises Posers

 The Labour Party has asked for clarification on the reported copies of the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) having the imprint of the Tinubu Legal Team on it.

It would be recalled that after the judgement of the Tribunal, a pdf file started circulating online as the copy of the ruling. 

Curious to note was the header at the top of each page bearing the imprint of the legal team of the APC.

The candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Atiku had through his aide, Phrank Shaibu, inquired to know why Tinubu Presidential Legal Team (TPLT) are been accorded special privileges.

READ ALSO: Man Arrested For Conniving With Pastor To Sell Son's Hunchback For N10m

The Labour Party through a statement by its National Publicity Secretary, Obiora Ifoh raised similar query, directing its questions to both the PEPC and the Tinubu legal team.

Read the statement below:

"PEPC AND APC MUST COME CLEAN ON THE HEADER REFLECTED ON THE CTC OF THE JUDGMENT ISSUED TO APC

....Says let it not be another glitch

"Consequent upon the revelation that Certified True Copies (CTC) of the recent judgment by the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC) had an imprint, “Tinubu Presidential Legal Team” (TPLT) as its header, Nigerians are curious about such happenstance that has inevitably generated storm and controversy.

"The Labour Party was very disturbed by the delay in releasing the judgment expeditiously, only to be confronted with this befuddlement.

"The public is equally at pains trying to comprehend what is happening.

"The onus of explaining and dousing the unfolding controversy rests on the PEPC and the TPLT, the imprint owners. Clearly, the header is not a watermark. We note that only some of the petitioners received the same version.

"In a highly contentious case with dire national interest and implications, confirming that the PEPC did not confer any advantage, rights, or privileges to any party is imperative. This development must be cleared up quickly to avoid conjectures and the belief that something untoward happened. This cannot be the case of another glitch.

"The unsigned and undated statement issued puportedly by a senior counsel on behalf of the Tinubu Legal Team is misconceived and empty. The senior counsel claimed that the header is a watermark! It is not and can never be. Typically, a watermark is a faint imprint or design made on some papers during production and which can be seen when held up to the light. It helps in checking the genuineness of the paper.

"The senior counsel is responsible for unsubstantiating his claims and should not pass the buck to innocent parties. We of the Labour Party place it on record that the counsel who collected the judgment on behalf of our party and our candidate did so long after a representative of Tinubu Legal Team.

"Meanwhile, we call on the PEPC and APC to come clean on the CTC imprint and disclose whose imprimatur is inscribed on the entire judgment. Nigerians deserve the right to know and are demanding urgent answers."