- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
The striking members of the Academic Staff Union of Universities
(ASUU), yesterday approached the Court of Appeal, Abuja for an order to
stay the execution of a court judgement ordering it to end its ongoing
nationwide strike.
The university teachers have been on strike since
February 14, to press home their demands for improved funding for
universities and a review of salaries for lecturers, among other issues.
Justice Polycarp Hamman of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria, Abuja Division, had on Wednesday, while delivering ruling in an interlocutory injunction application by the federal government, restrained ASUU from continuing with the strike.
The judge had predicated his
decision on Section 18 of the Trade Dispute Act, that empowers him to
make such decisions in the interest of the nation.
Dissatisfied, the university lecturers yesterday filed a Notice of Appeal to challenge the order of the Industrial Court.
ASUU through its lawyer, Mr. Femi
Falana, SAN, had in a motion sought the leave of the court “to appeal
against the interlocutory ruling of the National Industrial Court of
Nigeria per Honourable Justice P.1. Hamman.”
The appellant also
prayed the court for another order, “staying execution of the order of
Justice Hamman … pending the hearing and determination of the
interlocutory Appeal.”
ASUU is claiming that the ruling of Justice Hamman affects its
fundamental rights to fair hearing, adding that it would be in the
interest of justice to stay the execution of same pending the hearing
and determination of the Appeal arising thereto.
In the 14 grounds of
proposed notice of appeal, ASUU is claiming that the trial Judge “erred
in law and thereby occasioned a miscarriage of justice when he decided
to hear and determine the Respondents’ motion for interlocutory
injunction when he knew or ought to have known that the substantive suit
filed by the Claimant was not initiated by due process of law.”
ASUU in grounds two of the appeal also claimed that Justice Hamman
misdirected himself in law and occasioned a miscarriage of justice when
he decided to hear other motions before the motion challenging court’s
jurisdiction on the matter.
The appellant further submitted that the learned trial judge erred in law when he held that “pursuant to Section 17 of the Trade Dispute Act, Section 18(1) E mandates the members of the Defendants/Respondents not to take part in any strike pending the determination of the suit.”
After several failed attempts to get the striking lecturers back
to work while negotiations continue, the government opted for the
current court action and prayed the court to compel ASUU to end the
nearly seven months old strike in the interest of the nation and the
Nigerian students who are suffering the most from the strike.
The
Ministry of Labour had approached the industrial court to challenge the
refusal of the striking lecturers to end the nearly seven months old
strike, claiming that millions of students have been out of school since
February 14, 2022 when they went on strike.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps

Comments
Post a Comment